The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the punishment of imprisonment (one year and six months) of the original judgment is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below is deemed to have judged that the defendant committed a crime against some victims; the defendant agreed with some victims; the defendant agreed with some victims even at the time of the trial; the defendant must support a healthy parent; although the defendant had been sentenced twice as a criminal act of the same kind; the defendant again committed each of the crimes of this case despite the fact that he had been sentenced three times or more as a result of the criminal act of larceny; the majority of victims and victims are not certain amount of damage; the court below seems to have sentenced to the lowest punishment within the scope of the punishment mitigated by discretionary mitigation, taking account of the circumstances favorable to the defendant, such as the defendant's age, character and behavior, occupation and environment; the process and result of the criminal act; and the circumstances after the criminal act, etc., the punishment of the court below is too appropriate and too unreasonable.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.