beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. Facts of recognition;
A. A. On August 5, 2016, the Plaintiff complained of the Dong-Jaeng and the Sspung-gu Department, and of the restriction on sports, etc., and was transferred to the Busan Fri-gu Department (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”) located in the Geum-gu Busan (hereinafter “Defendant Hospital”).
B. On August 9, 2016, the Defendant diagnosed the Plaintiff’s name of injury and disease as “culposis accompanied by the GRI and the Egymology (hereinafter “instant surgery”) as “culposis, etc. causing psychotropic symptoms by giving pressure and pressure to the vertebra, etc. due to the culic change of the side of the signboard with a view to interfering with the culposis,” and performed the instant surgery on August 10, 2016 (hereinafter “instant surgery”). From around August 13, 2016, the Defendant issued a prescription that the Plaintiff complained of the pain.
C. After the discharge of the Defendant Hospital, the Plaintiff continued to increase the number of the left-hand side booms and the floor of the Defendant Hospital, and applied it to the Yangsan National University Hospital.
At the time of the Republic of Korea, the rehabilitation department of the Yangsan-do University conducted a neighboring test to the plaintiff, and as a result, the department evaluated that the permanent disability of 35% of the plaintiff's labor ability was caused by the results of the examination of the Madrid type disorder [vert damage-V-1-c-5 (vertebrate damage-D-1-5)] by applying the results of the Madrid type disability of the plaintiff's present condition (verte damage-V-1-c-5 (v).
After the instant procedure, the Plaintiff had been under pressured by the Plaintiff, and as a result, the Plaintiff had no effect on preserved treatment any longer considering his/her opinions of cognization, the hospital of Busan National University was implementing the 5th century/1,000 ex post facto pressure and competence with respect to the Plaintiff on September 6, 2018.
[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap1 to 6 evidence, and this Court.