logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.01.15 2013가합68622
손해배상금
Text

The plaintiff's claim against the defendants is dismissed in entirety.

Litigation costs shall be borne by the plaintiff.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship 1) The Plaintiff is an incorporated farming association established for the purpose of running the business of collective cultivation and joint operation of agricultural crops. 2) The Defendant Korea Power Exchange is a corporation established for the purpose of operating the electricity market and the electric power system under Article 35 of the Electric Utility Act, and the Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation is a corporation established under the Korea Electric Power Corporation

B. The Plaintiff and Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation’s contract for the supply of electricity for agriculture between the Plaintiff and Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “instant contract for the supply of electricity for agriculture”).

(2) The Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter referred to as the “Korea Electric Power Corporation”) established by Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation.

) Four greenhouses such as free temperature rooms in 1586, clean 1586, supplied with electricity through the Cheongwon-gun (hereinafter referred to as “each greenhouse of this case”).

C. On September 15, 201, the Defendant Korea Electric Power Corporation (hereinafter “instant circular electric power”) conducted circular electric power (hereinafter “instant circular electric power”) for about 4:350,00 won across the country between 4:45 minutes and 45 minutes from September 15, 201, when the amount of electric consumption would exceed the amount of electric supply due to the shortage of spare power.

2) As a result, the post office line of this case was cut off for about 40 minutes from 15:31:17 to 16:17 on the same day, from about 18:04:03 to about 18:34:03 on the same day, from about 30 minutes, from about 20 minutes, from about 20:01:5 to about 20:11:18 on the same day, each of the nine minutes of power was cut off (hereinafter referred to as “instant power”).

3) The Plaintiff cultivated crops through various electric devices in such a way as to maintain the temperature and habit of each greenhouse of this case at a certain level. The power failure to properly maintain the temperature and habit of each greenhouse of this case at a certain time due to the power failure to supply electricity to each greenhouse of this case.

[Ground of recognition] dispute.

arrow