1. All of the plaintiff's claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. The Plaintiff is the operator of the instant training establishment, which conducted workplace skill development training for the unemployed, etc. at the E-professional School located in Suwon-gu Busan (hereinafter “instant training establishment”) designated as the designated occupational training establishment by the Defendant pursuant to Article 28 of the Workers’ Vocational Skills Development Act, and operated training expenses subsidized by the Defendant. The training courses of the instant training establishment are as follows.

Type of each training course / the number of training hours / the number of training hours conducted / the fixed number of training hours (NCS per hour) (NCS) National Treasury-funded training expenses per head of the National Treasury for each training period and strategic industry (NCS) between October 13, 2015 and January 70, 2016, / 420 hours to 420 hours and 6/30 hours, and marketing strategy planning (6,684 won) 2,807,280 won C from August 25, 2015 to February 15, 2016 to 20 hours of solar energy production (6,832 won) 4,782,40 won.

B. On December 3, 2015, the Defendant conducted the direction and supervision of the instant training facility with respect to the instant training course (hereinafter “B”) and conducted the training following a hearing on January 6, 2016, on the ground that the Defendant issued seven tickets out of the total nine tickets of the recognized teaching materials to the trainees, Article 19 of the Workers’ Vocational Skills Development Act, Article 6-3 [Attachment Table 1-2] of the Enforcement Rule of the Workers’ Vocational Skills Development Act

2. (5) Pursuant to paragraph (a) (A), B cancellation of recognition and one year (from January 7, 2016 to January 6, 2017) imposed a disposition restricting the entrustment and recognition of the relevant process (hereinafter “instant first disposition”) on the Plaintiff.

C. On January 26, 2016, the Defendant conducted a joint inspection of the vocational ability review board and the instant training establishment with respect to the above C curriculum (hereinafter “C”), and conducted a joint inspection on the instant training establishment, contrary to the contents recognized on March 8, 2016, the Defendant conducted a voluntary change of the training contents, conducted a voluntary change of the training contents, conducted a training at an approved training place, and conducted a training at an unauthorized training place.