logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.01.22 2015가단38412
청소비용
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The gist of the Plaintiff’s assertion is the company running the cleaning service business, which entered into a contract for cleaning service with the Defendant from July 1, 2009 to December 31, 2014, and provided cleaning services to the Defendant company.

(2) The Plaintiff provided cleaning services to the Defendant during the contract period (hereinafter “instant cleaning services”). However, the Plaintiff did not receive total of KRW 36,960,000 from the Defendant, including the cost of external glass cleaning, the cost of purchasing cremation installed in toilets, and the cost of purchasing cleaning materials.

Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff KRW 36,960,000, which is the sum of the above costs, and damages for delay.

2. With respect to the performance of cleaning services in this case, there is no evidence to acknowledge that the Defendant agreed to pay the Plaintiff expenses such as outside glass cleaning expenses, purchase expenses of cremation sites, cleaning costs, etc. in addition to the agreed cleaning service costs.

(3) In the case of a cleaning service contract with the Defendant, if there is no agreement between the Plaintiff and the Defendant to separately pay the cost of cleaning service, it shall be deemed that the said amount is included in the contract amount, even if the amount of cleaning service fee agreed with the Defendant is insufficient to cover the cost of cleaning outside glass, the purchase cost of cremation, and the cost of cleaning.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow