Defendant 2016 Highest 4095, the 2015 Highest 3945, the 2016 Highest 2307, the 2015 Highest 2015 Highest 3945, the 2016 Highest 2307.

Punishment of the crime

On September 9, 2011, the Defendant was sentenced to one year and four months of imprisonment for fraud, etc. at the Daejeon District Court on December 2, 201, and was released on May 25, 2012 while the judgment became final and conclusive on December 2, 201, and the remaining term of imprisonment was expired on July 15, 2012.

"2015 Highest 3945"

1. Crimes committed on March 31, 2015;

A. On March 31, 2015, the Defendant shall have the victim C work as the head of the management office in order to operate the H gas station located in G in the official city in the Seo-gu Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon.

If you want to work in the main claim, you will purchase the vehicle at a price of at least five million won in excess of the market price if you send money to the vehicle.

“The purpose of “ was to make a false representation.”

However, the defendant did not want to purchase a motor vehicle with money because he did not have any particular property or income, even if he received the purchase cost of the motor vehicle, so he did not want to purchase the motor vehicle with money.

As such, the Defendant: (a) by deceiving the victim; (b) received a cash of KRW 800,000 from the victim, i.e., a delivery of KRW 4,150,000,000 from the victim for the purchase of the motor vehicle; (c) received a remittance of KRW 4,150,000 from the corporate bank account under the name of the Defendant; and

6. 2150,000 won, and the same month.

8. The transfer of 1 million won to each of the above accounts was received and delivered a total of KRW 10 million.

B. On March 31, 2015, the Defendant by fraud of the purchase cost of the guaranty insurance policy shall obtain a similar guaranty insurance policy from the said victim by phoneing to the said victim at the seat of the following:

The cost will be purchased on the face of the week.

“False speech was made to the effect that it was “.”

However, in fact, H’s gas station was unable to engage in business until December 2015, and there was no reason to purchase the surety insurance policy, and even if the Defendant received the guaranty insurance policy due to no particular property or income, it was thought that it was used for the cost of living, and thus there was no intention or ability to purchase the securities with such money.

The defendant.