The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The sentence of imprisonment (six months) of the lower court is too unreasonable in light of all the circumstances, including the fact that the Defendant reflects the instant crime in depth.

2. It is recognized that the decision-making defendant respondeds to the crime of this case and reflects it.

However, the Defendant committed a crime without a license in 2008, 700,000 won, 209, and 5 million won in 2010, and was subject to a suspended sentence once and two times of a fine. In particular, on October 17, 2012, the Defendant was sentenced to one year of imprisonment with prison labor and three years of a suspended sentence for violating the Road Traffic Act by driving his/her own blick car under the influence of alcohol in the support of the Daejeon District Court, Daejeon District Court on October 17, 2012, and on October 25, 2012, it appears that the Defendant committed a crime of driving the same vehicle without a license in the same condition as of the date the above judgment became final and conclusive on October 25, 201, and that it was inevitable for the Defendant to have been sentenced to imprisonment with prison labor for not more than 2 months before and after the date of the suspended sentence, and that it was inevitable for him/her to have been sentenced to a less than 10 months of imprisonment without prison labor.