logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 정읍지원 2015.10.06 2015고정87
교통사고처리특례법위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who is engaged in driving of a vehicle for his/her own seat.

1. On March 1, 2015, the Defendant violated the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (hereinafter “Special Cases”), driving the said vehicle on the street front of the E plant located in Jeong-Eup, Jung-si, and driving the said vehicle on the street in front of the E plant located in Jung-si, and driving the said vehicle directly along the two-lanes from the direction of the Shi-Eup and Seo-Eup.

At the time, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive the motor vehicle by accurately manipulating the steering gear, brakes and other devices of the motor vehicle, because the motor vehicle was parked in the front door at the time, and thus, the driver of the motor vehicle had a duty of care to safely drive it.

Nevertheless, due to negligence of neglecting this, the victim F (ma, 33 years old) driving vehicle in front of the direction direction was not found, and the part of the defendant's vehicle front part was shocked by the vehicle front part of the victim's vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim F, such as salt, tension, etc. of the bones of wood, which requires approximately two weeks of medical treatment from the victim F by negligence in the above occupational negligence.

2. The Defendant violated the Road Traffic Act at the time and place under the above paragraph (1) by negligence on the part of the Defendant damaged the property amounting to KRW 7,096,30 at least KRW 2,146,780 of the repair cost, such as sembbine, etc., owned by the Victim F.

3. The Defendant in violation of the Guarantee of Automobile Accident Compensation Act is a holder who actually manages and operates the said car.

A motor vehicle owner is prohibited from operating a motor vehicle which is not covered by mandatory insurance, such as liability insurance, on a road, but is not covered by mandatory insurance at the same time and place as referred to in the above paragraph (1).

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and I;

1. The police statement concerning F;

1. The actual condition survey report;

1. Mandatory insurance policies (C);

arrow