The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

1. The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a DNA car.

On June 25, 2015, around 15:22, the Defendant started the said passenger car which was parked on the front side road of the Gangseo-gu Seoul, Gangnam-gu.

Since there is no distinction between delivery and vehicular road, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by safely driving a person engaged in driving a motor vehicle by accurately manipulating steering devices, brakes, etc.

Nevertheless, the Defendant was negligent in leaving the road to the right side of the passenger car of the Defendant, and the Defendant was the victim F (F, 35 years of age) who was on the right side of the passenger car of the Defendant.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered, due to the above occupational negligence, serious injury, such as spin pressure 12 weeks needed to give approximately 12 weeks medical treatment, freshing the body frame of the body body of the influenent light, 16 weeks in number of treatment days, fluent stress disorder requiring treatment for approximately 6 months, acute stress disorder requiring treatment, depression disease, fluoring the artificial satellite development for treatment days, fluoring the brecing bre that requires treatment for approximately 5 weeks, etc.

2. The facts charged in the instant case are crimes falling under Article 3(1) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents and Article 268 of the Criminal Act, which cannot be prosecuted against the victim’s express intent pursuant to the main sentence of Article 3(2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents. According to the records, it can be acknowledged that the victim submitted an agreement stating that the victim would not want to punish the defendant after the institution of the instant case. Thus, the instant prosecution is dismissed pursuant to Article 3