Defendants shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

In the event that the Defendants did not pay the above fine, each of them is 100.

Punishment of the crime

The F church now has a serious dispute, such as mutual complaint and accusation, because it is divided into the members requesting the withdrawal of the above pastors and the members complying with the above pastors' policies, due to the utilization of the church funds of the G pastors.

Defendants are teachers in accordance with the policies of pastors, and victims H(V, 47 years of age) demand the withdrawal of pastors against the contrary.

At around 14:30 on June 2, 2017, the Defendants: (a) 14:30, the first floor of the F church new road in Yeongdeungpo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government I, and (b) 1: (c) the victim was forced to go out of the victim; (d) Defendant A was pushed down with the victim’s shoulder and shoulder, etc., such as the victim’s name dissatisfy; (e) Defendant B was released from the victim’s arms; (e) Defendant E was pushed down with the victim’s arms; (e) Defendant E was pushed away from the victim’s arms; and (e) Defendant C was pushed down with the victim’s shoulder and shoulder, etc., such as the victim’s name dissatisfy.

As a result, the Defendants assaulted the victim jointly with the nameless members.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of the witness H and K;

1. Each statement made by H and K in the police statement made by the H with respect to H;

1. Complaint;

1. Video CDs;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a criminal investigation report (such as attaching images to a visual closure photograph and images on damaged parts);

1. The Defendants: Article 2(2)1 of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act, Article 260(2)1 of the Criminal Act, the selection of fines

1. Defendants to be detained in a workhouse: Articles 70(1) and 69(2) of the Criminal Act

1. Defendants of the provisional payment order: The Defendants’ assertion on the assertion by the Defendants of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act are against the sexual intercourse between the sexual Does supporting G pastor at the time (hereinafter referred to as “the sexual Does on the church”) and the opposite sexual Does (hereinafter referred to as “the opposite sexual Does”). In the situation where there is a dangerous risk of the outbreak, i.e., the sexual Do on the side of the church would be against the other sexual Does in order to avoid any further Mumes.