A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Punishment of the crime

On December 19, 2005, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea on December 10, 2008, and departed from the Republic of Korea on December 10, 2008. The Defendant, in a normal way, pretended to be another person who makes it difficult to re-enter the Republic of Korea, had the intention to enter the Republic of Korea, and acquired a counterfeited passport under the name of D around April 29, 201 through C, Brered with a inner passport, and acquired the visa of the Republic of Korea using the above forged passport.

1. On August 8, 2011, the Defendant related to entry inspections entered the Republic of Korea by presenting the relevant forged passport and visa to the public official in charge of entry inspections at the Incheon International Airport entry inspection team, and by driving as if he was D.

In this way, the defendant exercised a private document on a forged certificate of fact, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.

2. Around August 26, 2011, the Defendant related to alien registration filed a foreigner registration in his/her name by the Suwon Immigration Office located in the Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the public official in charge of alien registration, presenting the above forged passport, while driving as if he/she was D.

In this way, the defendant exercised a private document on a forged certificate of fact, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.

3. On July 11, 2012, the Defendant related to the extension of the sojourn period was permitted at the above Suwon Immigration Office on July 11, 2012 by the public official in charge of the extension of sojourn period examination as if he was D.

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of official duties by fraudulent means.

4. On August 6, 2013, the Defendant related to the extension of the sojourn period was permitted at the Dongwon Immigration Office to extend the sojourn period at around August 6, 2013, and the public official in charge of examining the extension of sojourn period was permitted to extend the sojourn period as he/she was D.

In this way, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.