logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2014.05.14 2014고단1509
위조사문서행사등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On May 13, 200, the Defendant entered the Republic of Korea on February 23, 2005, and left the Republic of Korea on February 23, 2005. The Defendant, in a normal way, conspired to enter the Republic of Korea as if he was another person difficult to re-entry the Republic of Korea, and acquired a visa of the Republic of Korea using a forged passport, the date of birth acquired around 2004, with a false passport indicating the false date of birth.

1. On August 23, 2010, the Defendant involved in entry inspection entered the Republic of Korea by presenting the relevant forged passport to the public official in charge of entry inspection at the Incheon International Airport entry inspection team.

In this way, the defendant exercised a private document on a forged certificate of fact, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.

2. On September 2, 2010, the Defendant related to a foreigner registration filed a foreigner registration by the Suwon Immigration Office located in the Young-gu, Suwon-si, Suwon-si, and the public official in charge of a foreigner registration by presenting the above forged passport.

In this way, the defendant exercised a private document on a forged certificate of fact, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.

3. On August 18, 201, the Defendant related to the extension of the period of stay on or around August 18, 201, obtained permission to extend the period of stay at the above Suwon Immigration Office and the public official in charge of examining the extension of the period of stay, presenting the above forged passport.

In this way, the defendant exercised a private document on a forged certificate of fact, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.

4. On July 17, 2012, the Defendant related to the extension of the period of sojourn was permitted by the above Suwon Immigration Office at around July 17, 2012 and by presenting the above forged passport to the public official in charge of examining the extension of the period of sojourn.

In this way, the defendant exercised a private document on a forged certificate of fact, and at the same time interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of public officials by fraudulent means.

5. On August 12, 2013:

arrow