logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2013.06.26 2013고단565
아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(성매수등)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 3,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall induce a child or youth to buy sex or have him/her sell sex in order to boost sex of a child or youth.

At around 23:00 on November 6, 2012, the Defendant decided to purchase a child F (n, female, 13 years old) who decided to reach a certain condition on the way in front of the Domotong located in Seopopo City C, with cash of 150,000 won, but did not purchase a sex because the victim did not enter the Domoto.

The defendant provided 150,000 won in cash to children and juveniles F who are 13 years of age and recommended them to sell sex.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Statement of the police statement concerning F;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes on seizure records and list of seizure;

1. Article 10 (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse (wholly amended by Act No. 11572, Dec. 18, 2012);

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 13 (1) (main sentence) and (2) of the Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse before order to complete a program;

1. Where a conviction is finalized against a defendant who has registered personal information of this case pursuant to Article 48(1) of the Criminal Act, the defendant constitutes a person subject to registration of personal information pursuant to Article 33 of the former Act on the Protection of Children and Juveniles against Sexual Abuse, and is obligated to submit personal information to a competent agency pursuant to Article 34 of the same

The reason for sentencing was that the defendant tried to purchase the sex of a juvenile who is merely 13 years old and is subject to protection and guidance.

Since the nature of the crime is not very good, it should be held strictly responsible for it. However, considering the fact that the defendant has no record of crime before, and the fact that the above juvenile is dead and agreed to do so, it is decided as the disposition of the fine.

arrow