logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 서부지원 2017.11.27 2017고정174
명예훼손등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 500,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, he/she shall be the defendant for five days.

Reasons

Criminal facts

1. On April 4, 2017, the Defendant: (a) took out the part of the Defendant’s residence beera, and took part in the beera of the Defendant’s residence; and (b) took part in the victim’s part, the Defendant publicly insultingd the victim by “Doar fe . Mae . Mae . Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma. Ma.”

2. On April 5, 2017, the Defendant cut trees illegally to the victim before the Busanbuk-gu apartment house and the 1111 Dong guard room.

The water quality shall be fluort, fluort, and fluort at night in the room.

“The honor of the victim was damaged by openly pointing out false facts.”

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. The witness D and E’s respective legal statements [the defendant and his defense counsel did not have insult or defamation at the time of making the statements as indicated in the judgment and there was no performance;

The argument is asserted.

However, it is evident that the Defendant’s words such as “Domine”, “Simine”, and “unlawfully franchise” that referred the victim per se would undermine the social assessment of the victim. As such, insofar as the Defendant recognized the contents of the horses he/she did not have an intent of insult or defamation, insofar as he/she did so, he/she did not have such intent.

subsection (b) of this section.

In addition, according to the witness D and E's each legal statement, the defendant and the victim were at a public place outside the apartment building room at the time when the defendant makes the statement as described in paragraph 1 of the judgment of the court below, and there was 4-5 members of the apartment environment U.S. dollars around the victim, and the defendant and the victim were at a public place in the front of the apartment guard room at the time when they make the statement as described in paragraph 2 of the judgment of the court below, and the facts that the residents, including the security guards, were gathered in the surrounding areas can be recognized. Thus, each act of the defendant'

1. Relevant Article 311 of the Criminal Act and Article 311 of the Criminal Act regarding criminal facts as to the choice of punishment (the point of insult, the selection of fines) and Article 307(2) of the Criminal Act (the point of defamation and the selection of fines).

arrow