beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.
However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
1. The Defendant interfered with business, and the violation of the Housing Act newly constructed and sold apartment units in the name of “D apartment units” in the name of “D apartment units” on the site of “D apartment units,” while the Defendant knew that the applicants for apartment sale contracts who are not partners should complete resident registration in Gyeyang-gu and supply preferentially to the actual residents by May 24, 2018, the date of the public announcement of the invitation of occupants, with respect to the general supply and special supply of apartment units in accordance with the Housing Act and related Acts and subordinate statutes, and offered to divide profits by resale upon the Defendant’s application for sale, after he transferred the apartment units in the name of “D apartment units.”
No person shall be supplied with or have others be supplied with housing constructed and supplied pursuant to the Housing Act by fraud or other improper means.
Nevertheless, on May 18, 2018, the Defendant conspired with E to access the “civil petition 24” website by using a computer at his own house located in Yong-Gun, Chungcheongnam-gu, Seoul, to the above domicile, and subsequently changed his domicile by means of filing a resident registration transfer report with the Defendant to the effect that he had moved into the “Yyang-si F and G,” provided by the Defendant. On May 31, 2018, the Defendant connected the apartment speculation site where he can file an application for the above D apartment unit subscription using a computer at his own house to sell new apartment unit with a certified copy of the resident registration number stating the false address, etc., and the victim association determined E to be the number of buyers of the above D apartment unit H, and concluded a sales contract with E and the above H on June 19, 2018.
Accordingly, the defendant is the buyer of the redevelopment apartment in collusion with E by means of fraudulent means.