The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

In light of the following circumstances, the lower court rendered a sentence within the scope of sentencing guidelines, considering the Defendant’s age, sex, family relationship, family environment, motive and means of a crime, circumstances after a crime, etc., taking into account the favorable circumstances that the Defendant did not have any record of the same kind of crime except three times of a fine.

The appellate court, compared to the first instance court, has no change in the conditions of sentencing, and the first instance sentencing does not deviate from the reasonable scope of discretion, it is reasonable to respect the first instance sentencing judgment.

In light of the fact that the defendant made confessions of all the facts constituting an offense against his husband, divorced from her husband, and has yet to be able to support her children, the sentencing conditions mentioned above have been significantly changed in the trial.

In light of the above sentencing conditions, it is difficult to see that the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable because it is too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition (Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act.