1. Defendant UWnB Co., Ltd.: (a) KRW 28,568,762 for the Plaintiff and its related amount from January 30, 2014 to January 14, 2015.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant Shee Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Shee Construction”) contracted the new construction of the Seoul Guarantee Insurance Training Institute (hereinafter “instant construction”) located in 198-2, Young-dong, Youngnam-dong. Defendant UWnB Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant UWnB”).

B. After concluding a human resources supply contract with the Defendant U&S expenses, the Plaintiff drafted a contract for daily work-based labor supply with the purport that, from October 17, 2013 to November 14, 2013, the Plaintiff invested human resources from the instant construction site to Nov. 14, 2013; and, on November 9, 2013, the Plaintiff continued to work together with the Defendant U&S expenses to pay KRW 1.60,000 per day wages to the Plaintiff’s suppliers.

(2) In light of the legal principles as seen earlier, the Defendant’s revocation of confession does not constitute a violation of the principle of free evaluation of evidence against the principle of free evaluation of evidence against the principle of free evaluation of evidence against the principle of free evaluation of evidence against the principle of free evaluation of evidence.

C. The Plaintiff paid 88,702,450 won to the person who invested in the instant construction to the Plaintiff, and received 60,133,688 won from Defendant Shee Construction on December 31, 2013.

【Ground for Recognition: Facts without dispute, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, Gap evidence, and the purport of whole pleadings】

2. Determination as to the claim against Defendant UWnB

A. The defendant's judgment on this safety defense is based on the transfer of the status of a party to the service contract of this case to C, and thus, the lawsuit of this case is unlawful as it has no standing to be a party. However, since the plaintiff's assertion in the performance lawsuit has a standing to be the defendant, and the grounds for the defendant's assertion are grounds for determination within the merits, the defendant