logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2013.12.12 2013고단2462
사기
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for six months.

The defendant shall pay 13,390,000 won to an applicant for compensation.

This compensation order.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[Criminal Power] On July 12, 2013, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of six months of imprisonment for fraud at the Seoul Central District Court on July 2013, and the said judgment became final and conclusive on July 20, 2013.

The Defendant is a person who works for a travel agency called “C” and individually recruited travel visitors and sells travel goods.

On September 1, 2012, the Defendant provided a telephone conversation with the victim E at the Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Office on September 1, 2012, the Defendant provided that “The Defendant would have four-day golf travel per 700,000 won for each 700,000 won for the four-day golf travel.”

However, in fact, the defendant received the above money, first of all, intended to return it with the travel expenses of the customers who applied for golf operations, and there was no intention or ability to allow the victim E and his/her daily activities to travel.

As a result, the Defendant, from October 31, 2012, acquired 27,058,700 won from 34 victims, from that time to October 31, 2012, including by deceiving 2,80,000 won from victim E and three others.

"2013 Highest 4675" defendant is a person who works for a contact company and has operated a foreign golf travel business personally.

In August 2012, the Defendant made a false statement to the victim B at the LIG Non-Life Insurance Office located in the second floor of the 2nd floor of the Yung-si in Gangwon-do, Gangwon-do, stating that “The transaction price of the large-name container membership will exceed KRW 25 million originally, which would allow it to live in the 13 million won, thereby sending 1,390,000 won to the change of the container name.”

However, the facts are that the defendant only intended to return the above money to cover the expenses required for the travel business, and the defendant did not have the intent or ability to purchase a member of the right to contact with the victim.

Nevertheless, the defendant received money from the victim to the single bank account under the name of the defendant on the 30th day of the same month from the victim and acquired the money.

(i) the evidence;

arrow