beta
Plaintiff, Appellant
Plaintiff
Defendant, appellant and appellant
The head of Gangseo-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government (Law Firm Han, Attorneys Kim Jong-Un et al., Counsel for the defendant-appellant)
Conclusion of Pleadings
May 7, 2010
The first instance judgment
Seoul Administrative Court Decision 2009Gudan4367 decided July 22, 2009
Text
1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.
Purport of claim and appeal
1. The plaintiff's purport of claim
The Defendant’s disposition of imposing KRW 12,432,310 on the Plaintiff on December 29, 2008 is revoked.
2. The defendant's purport of appeal
The judgment of the first instance is revoked. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
Reasons
1. Quotation of judgment of the first instance;
The reasoning of this Court is that the reasoning of this case is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, and thus, this Court shall accept it in accordance with Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.
2. Conclusion
Therefore, the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit, and it is so decided as per Disposition.
Judges Kim Byung-chul (Presiding Judge)