1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. Basic facts

A. On January 24, 2018, the Plaintiff was subject to pactacy by the Defendant after vertebrate anesthesia at C Hospital.

(hereinafter “instant surgery”). B.

On January 26, 2018, the Plaintiff received simple urology and drug urology from C Hospital because of difficulty in urology. On January 27, 2018, the Plaintiff received urology and drug urology inserted and drug urology from C Hospital.

C. On February 1, 2018, the Plaintiff, who was admitted to C Hospital as a pain, was prescribed for antibiotic drugs and medical control. On February 2, 2018, the Plaintiff was discharged from C Hospital on February 8, 2018 after the Defendant’s preservation treatment (hereinafter “instant re-operation”).

On August 16, 2018, the Plaintiff was diagnosed by the Da Hospital with the dynacleic nuclear and antipathic nuclear and antipathic nuclear and received the hynacleic surgery from the D Hospital on October 15, 2018.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 6 through 8 (including branch numbers in the case of additional numbers), Eul evidence No. 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The Plaintiff asserts that, at the time of the instant surgery, excessive anesthesia caused pulmonal distress and blood pressure, etc., and the Defendant’s negligence in the process of the instant surgery and re-operation, the Plaintiff claimed that the Defendant is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by negligence in the surgery.

The following circumstances, which can be acknowledged by comprehensively taking into account the purport of the entire arguments, namely, the Korea Medical Dispute Mediation and Arbitration Agency, (1) performed the operation of the instant case to the extent appropriate. After vertebal anesthesia, the Plaintiff’s blood pressure and bee and bee and cling were maintained at Hg, 80-90m Hg, 80-90m Hg, 70/40m for the Plaintiff, and 55 times/minutes, and the Defendant was treated as appropriate to administer and observe the Ephedrine 40m for the Plaintiff, while maintaining the Plaintiff’s blood pressure and bee and bee and bee and bee and gling at 120-130/80m Hg, 80-90m.