1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 9, 2007, the Plaintiff is a person who, without entering the Republic of Korea on May 9, 2007, prepared a basis of living in Australia (hereinafter “Sariju”) and continuously resides therein.

B. On April 30, 2018, the Plaintiff applied for the reissuance of a passport to the Secretary General of the Republic of Korea, who vicariously performed the Defendant’s passport affairs. However, as a result of the personal identification investigation conducted under the Security Operational Rules at the time, it was confirmed that the Plaintiff was accused of fraud from B who borrowed money in 2007 and was suspended from prosecution and was assigned on July 3, 2007 (No. 2007 type 26423 at the Seoul Western District Prosecutors’ Office) and that the employee in charge was notified, the Plaintiff revoked the application for the issuance of a passport and requested the return of the fee, and the Defendant carried out the duties accordingly

C. However, on August 7, 2018, the Plaintiff notified the Korean consulates General of the Republic of Korea of the resolution of an inappropriate incident, and applied for the reissuance of a passport again.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant application”). The result of the personal identification investigation in response to the same day confirmed that the Plaintiff’s suspension of prosecution and the withdrawal of nomination was not yet released, and the staff in charge was informed the Plaintiff that it was difficult to issue a passport.

On August 10, 2018, the Defendant refunded the fee paid by the Plaintiff ($ 50,00) to the Plaintiff, returned the fee received by the Plaintiff due to the difficulty in proceeding thereafter, and discarded the relevant documents, and entered the status of receipt into the Integrated Passport Management System for Passport Information as “return (Transfer of Information)”, and whether to delete it as “defiscing”.

(hereinafter above rejection disposition of this case). E.

On November 20, 2014, the Plaintiff is a visa that grants a license to permanently stay in Australia if a person in Australia border wishes to be protected.

It shall be transferred for reference to the English explanation on the homepage of the Australian immigration country.

"This visa is for people who are in Australia and want...