The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is that the court below rejected the credibility of C’s statement without reasonable grounds and acquitted the facts charged in this case. The court below erred by misapprehending the facts, thereby affecting the conclusion of the judgment.

2. Determination

A. On May 2, 2014, the summary of the instant facts charged: (a) around 19:00, the victim C divided the Defendant’s face into 3rd class old 40-ro, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Daejeon, Seo-gu, Daejeon, into knife, once a week; (b) knife the Defendant’s face; (c) knife the ebbbbbage into the office floor; and (d) knife the shoulder.

The Defendant, against the violence of the victim, dump batd the victim's bat and batd the victim's bat, and fatd the victim's face once.

B. The lower court determined that: (a) the evidence as shown in the facts charged in the instant case includes C’s legal statement; (b) the statement of each police interrogation protocol of the Defendant against C; and (c) the damaged part of C’s photograph and the injury diagnosis document showing the Defendant reveal that C took the face of the Defendant; (b) it is difficult to believe C’s statement that C took the face of the Defendant’s face; and (c) when considering C’s photograph of the damaged part of the Defendant’s face, it is difficult to believe C’s face is red; (d) while the damaged part of the damaged part of the Defendant’s face was red, the entire red color is displayed by C; and (e) if the Defendant requested the police officer to put the Defendant in assault with C, it is insufficient to recognize the facts charged in the instant case; and (e) there is no other evidence to acknowledge the facts charged in the instant case.

C. Examining the evidence duly admitted and examined by the court below, closely, the evidence submitted by the prosecutor as stated in the court below is sufficient to examine the victim.