logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2014.12.09 2014고정738
특정경제범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(알선수재)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

No person shall receive, request or promise money, valuables or other benefits to arrange matters pertaining to the duties of an executive or employee of a financial institution.

On March 3, 2009, the Defendant: (a) from D, which was known to the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the office of the bank, “I wish to consult with the office of the E, who is known to the office of the office of the office of the office of the bank, and I would like to know about the loan problem; (b) I would like to know the office of the office of the office of the bank, and (c) I would like to help the bank to get loans from the office of the office of the office of the company; (d) received money and (d)

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness F and E;

1. Partial statement of witness D;

1. Some statements of each prosecutor's protocol of examination of the defendant against the defendant;

1. According to the F’s statement of the witness F of the Han Bank’s reply data, F was in urgent situation when sending the instant money, and F was contacted on the way to contact with the Defendant and the Defendant on the way to contact with G, who was living together with G, and was asked to do so. As the Defendant’s talking about the loan certificate does not run, F would be able to be able to even borrow a loan certificate even after 1-2 years or more since the demand was continued, and the Defendant first met on the day of sending the money.”

arrow