logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2016.08.24 2016고단1635
공무집행방해등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for a period of two months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the indictment against insult is dismissed.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On December 12, 2014, the Defendant was sentenced to four years of imprisonment with prison labor and a fine of 300,000 won for robbery, etc. at the Seoul Central District Court on April 13, 2015, and the judgment became final and conclusive on April 13, 2015, and is currently serving in prisons of the government, and on January 14, 2016, the judgment was finalized on April 30, 2016 upon being sentenced to two months of imprisonment with prison labor for fraud in the Jungyang Branch Branch of the District Court.

On January 14, 2016, the Defendant argued that D’s entrance was closed at 111-76, Dong Dong C of the government prison in order to ensure that D’s entrance was closed at a prison G and meal hours belonging to 1nd F of the government prison security of the government, in order to ensure that D’s inmate’s entrance was closed at around 07:05, Jinsan-ro 111-76.

At the time, a correctional officer G, who had kept safe guard at the time, reported the opening of the door of D, E demanded to leave the door, and was refused to bring a dispute, and the C prisoner H expressed this in the process of this C prisoner H's resistance.

Accordingly, a correctional officer G reflects that “I will Chewing,” and the Defendant expressed a bath to H by a correctional officer G.

I think, while there are several prisoners such as I, they put the window of the entrance in hand, put the face into the window, string the eye in the window, string the eye in the window, and put the prison officer G into intimidation, "I am Chewing, I am sing off, I am string, I am string off in the snow in the eye," and "I am string off in the eye of thep's government."

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the legitimate execution of duties of prison officer G prisoners' safe guard.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant’s legal statement

1. A protocol concerning the examination of suspect of H with respect to the police;

1. Each police statement made to J, G, K, I, and E;

1. A written statement I and K;

1. Complaints and respective working reports;

1. Previous convictions: A criminal investigation report (a copy of the judgment of the case concerned - a separate judgment), a report on the results of confirmation of the previous convictions of each disposition, and a defendant to whom the statute applies is recorded as the first head of the crime of this case.

arrow