1. The Defendant: (a) against Plaintiff A, the amount of KRW 44,215,974, Plaintiff B, C, D, and E respectively; and (b) against each of the said amounts of KRW 29,043,524.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. On December 24, 2018, G driven H bus (hereinafter “the instant vehicle”) around 04:49, and caused the death of the network I (hereinafter “the network I”) with the front part of the instant vehicle in accordance with the pedestrian signal by failing to comply with the duty of care to safely drive and prevent accidents by checking whether or not there is a person who gets on the front side of the instant vehicle while driving the Michuhol-gu Office distance from the border of Michuhol-gu Incheon, Michuhol-gu, to the border side of the sublime at the direction of Michuhol-gu, Michuhol-gu, Incheon, to reduce the speed while moving on the right side to the right side of the sublim, and by neglecting the duty of care to safely drive and prevent accidents in advance.

(hereinafter “instant accident”). B.

G was indicted for violating the Act on Special Cases Concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents (Death) by the Incheon District Court 2019 Man-Ma1980 due to the instant accident, and was sentenced to a judgment of two years of suspended execution in August 25, 2019, and the said judgment became final and conclusive as it is.

C. The Defendant is a mutual aid business entity that entered into a mutual aid agreement to compensate for damage caused by an accident that occurred during the operation of the instant vehicle, and the deceased’s heir is the Plaintiff B, C, D, and E, who is the spouse.

[Ground of recognition] The fact that there is no dispute, Gap's 1 through 5, Gap's 11, and 12, the purport of the whole pleadings

2. Determination

가. 손해배상 책임의 발생 1) 위 인정사실에 의하면, 피고 차량의 공제계약자인 피고는 이 사건 사고로 인하여 망인과 그 상속인인 원고들이 입은 손해를 배상할 책임이 있다. 2) 피고는, 망인이 이 사건 사고 당시 야간에 인적이 드문 횡단보도를 보행중이었으므로 주변을 잘 살피면서 횡단보도를 건넜어야 함에도 이를 게을리한 과실이 있고, 이를 피해자측 과실로 참작하여 피고의...