logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울고등법원 2017.11.29 2017누77741
난민불인정결정취소
Text

1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

Reasons

The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited the same reasoning as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, since the reasoning of the judgment is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, Article 8(2) of the Administrative Litigation Act and the main text of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

Part 3 of the judgment of the court of first instance, "Nos. 5 and 6 1 and 2 of the evidence Nos. 5 and 6" of the judgment of the court of first instance shall be deemed "Nos. 5 through 7 1, 2".

No. 3 of the first instance judgment, the first instance judgment’s “Ire.......” is deemed to be “Ire,” and it is difficult to view otherwise on the sole basis of the fact that the first instance judgment’s vulnerable country index among the vulnerable country index in 2017, which was announced by the Peace Pece, a non-profit corporation of the United States, is 96 points and is the most vulnerable country from the world to the world to the 24th place.”

In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow