logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2017.01.18 2016고단976
사서명위조등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

However, the execution of the above punishment shall be suspended for a period of two years from the date this judgment becomes final and conclusive.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On June 30, 2016, the Defendant, instead of Jinju City around 02:20 on June 30, 2016, at the 304 subordinate Maart India, she saw that she was driving away by the victim B (22) and caused a dispute as to why she was fright and why she was frighted, and she was frighted by the victim’s head and her hand.

Accordingly, the defendant assaulted the victim.

2. On June 30, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 03:45, at the D police box located in Jinju-si, Jinju-si, the Defendant: (b) took place as if he was the Defendant E, who was a punishment of the police officer, in order to mislead the Defendant to believe that he was on the part of the fine, and not to be arrested; (c) stated that he was “E” at the end of the letter of voluntary accompanying agreement and carried off the name following the request.

Accordingly, the Defendant forged another person’s signature for the purpose of exercising the right.

3. The Defendant, at the time and place specified in paragraph 2, submitted a letter of voluntary consent of accompanying, prepared by forging the signature of “E” as above, to F officer of the police box with no knowledge of the fact.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised his signature of a forged person.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police against B;

1. Each statement of the F;

1. Application of statutes governing voluntary consent to accompanying;

1. Relevant legal provisions of the Criminal Act, Article 260(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of assault and assault, the choice of imprisonment), Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of private signature) and Article 239(2) and Article 239(1) of the Criminal Act (the point of exercising the above-mentioned signature) of the option of criminal facts;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act on the suspended execution;

1. In light of the fact that the reason for sentencing under Article 62-2 of the Criminal Act on the observation of protection and observation has the record of having been punished several times as a crime of violence, and that the defendant committed the crime of this case, and subsequently, stolen personal information of his/her name of punishment, etc., the responsibility for the crime of the defendant is not against the law.

However, the extent of violence used by the defendant is not limited.

arrow