1. The plaintiffs' claims against the defendants are all dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. The status of the parties 1) The Plaintiff A is a net G (H students).

hereinafter referred to as “the deceased”

The plaintiff B and C are the deceased's spouse(s) and the deceased's children(s) are the deceased's children(s) 2. The defendant D is the will to operate IBA, the defendant E is the doctor to run the JJ department, and the defendant FIC hospital is the user of the K Hospital (hereinafter "the defendant FI Hospital").

B. On January 2, 2014, Defendant D and E’s completion of each medical examination and treatment were issued by the Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, when the rate of the hysian hysian hysian hysian hysian hys hysian hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys hys

After the diagnosis of the deceased, Defendant D diagnosed the deceased as in detail unexplosion, acute organ infection, acute dyeitis, etc., and prescribed 4-day cryphosomes, such as heat melting agents, stokes, and stophos, to treat the deceased inculical manner.

3) Around 11:00 on January 27, 2014, the Deceased complained of the symptoms of the sacrife, the outbreak of the sacrife, the sacrife, and the sacrife. Around 11:00, the Deceased complained of the symptoms of the sacrife. Defendant D added the possibility of sacrife pulmonary pulmonary disease caused by the sacrife infection by the presumed diagnosis after the diagnosis of the Deceased, but did not prescribe a separate sacrife test(s) or sacrifife, the Deceased prescribed a separate sife sifecife, sife, sifflife, sife, and disguised medication. 4) around 17:00 on January 27, 2014, the Deceased complained of the sacr.

After the diagnosis of the Deceased, Defendant E diagnosed the Deceased as acute organ infection, etc., and prescribed the euthanasia, piracy control, antilyceros, and disguised medication.

Although Defendant E did not separately perform the reading test or safluent prescription, Defendant E also provided a mixed number of safluents at the request of the deceased.

5 The Deceased did not change the status around 09:00 on January 28, 2014.