1. The plaintiff's appeal is all dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. Basic facts

A. Defendant B and C are doctors within the primary medical institution that treated the network D (Ears; hereinafter “the deceased”), and Defendant National Cancer Center is a third medical institution that performed transplant surgery between the deceased.

The plaintiff is the father of the deceased.

B. On May 13, 2008, the Deceased was treated within the F1 operated by Defendant B, and on May 13, 2008, the Deceased was treated. At the time, the Deceased was treated with scambling, scaming, scaming, scaming, scaming, scaming, scaming, and scaming, and there were symptoms such as a scam, scaming, and scaming. Defendant B diagnosed the symptoms of the Deceased as acute scamitis for three days, and prescribed scamscam for scamine scamscamscam, scamscam, scamscam, and scamscamine.2) on May 15, 2008, the Deceased scambamscam, scaming, scaming, scaming, and scamine scamine.

3) On May 16, 2008, the Deceased, who was within the G department operated by Defendant C, used the cold medication for three days, and explained his symptoms to the deceased that there was a Gutotoo and a district without improvement. Defendant C performed the heart inspection to the Deceased, and prescribed spatitis, piracy, and antibiotics. Meanwhile, Defendant C attempted to conduct urine inspection to the Deceased, but the Deceased did not cause any urine. 4) On May 17, 2008, the Deceased was within the emergency department of the G department operated by Defendant C, and the Deceased did not have any urine. The Deceased explained that there was a symptoms that the urine was aline and the urine was not hidden, while taking medicines prescribed by the individual hospital.