1. The plaintiffs' respective claims against the defendants are dismissed in entirety.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. At around 01:30 on June 8, 2013, the Plaintiffs and the Defendants posted a vision on the ground that their body was faced in front of the Felel in Jeju, E.

In the process, Defendant D, as a drinking, took the back head of Plaintiff B, took the face part of Plaintiff A, and took the face part of Plaintiff C, Defendant C took the face part of Plaintiff B, and Defendant C took the face part of Plaintiff A.

B. The Defendants are the Defendants on November 28, 2013.

As described in paragraph (1), each of the crimes committed by the violation of the Punishment of Violences, etc. Act (joint injury) that inflict bodily injury on the left-hand side of the 4 weeks of treatment on the part of the plaintiff A, which requires approximately nine weeks of treatment, and the injury on the 4th left-hand side of the 4 weeks of treatment on the plaintiff B was sentenced to a suspended sentence of ten years of imprisonment for each of the following reasons: (a) on December 6, 2013, the above judgment became final and conclusive on December 6, 2013.

(c).

As part of the amount of damage reimbursement during the criminal proceedings described in paragraph (1) above, Defendant C deposited for the Plaintiff KRW 7,000,000 for the Plaintiff, KRW 3,000,000 for the Plaintiff, KRW 7,000 for the Plaintiff, and KRW 3,000 for the Plaintiff B, respectively.

(No. 2375 through 2378). [Grounds for recognition] of absence of dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 through 5, 8, and 9 (including provisional number; hereinafter the same shall apply) and the purport of the whole pleadings.

2. According to the above facts found in the occurrence of liability for damages, the Defendants jointly inflicted an injury on the Plaintiffs, and thus, they jointly have the obligation to compensate for the damages suffered by the Plaintiffs.

However, according to the above evidence and the purport of the entire pleadings, the defendants' liability is limited to 90% in light of the fact that the plaintiff C's breath alcohol and the defendant's breathing theory is deemed to have been the cause of the expansion of dispute.

3. Scope of liability for damages

(a) the period of hospitalization during which a certificate of the amount recognized as 1 per-day income is issued, during the period of stabilization fee.