beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 79,719,250 to Plaintiff A, KRW 71,989,687 to Plaintiff B, and KRW 3,50,000 to Plaintiff C, and each of them.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On October 14, 2015, at around 01:00, Defendant D, along with Nonparty F, discovered G Ethz vehicles from the alley-ro 38 Drick-ro, Nam-gu, Incheon, Incheon (hereinafter “instant vehicle”), stolen the keys of the instant vehicle located in the front door-receiving space of the instant vehicle’s driver’s seat, and stolen the instant vehicle by using the said keys around 01:40 on October 15, 2015.
B. On October 15, 2015, Defendant D, driving the instant vehicle without a car driver’s license on October 15, 2015, and driving the instant 3rd line road in front of the 2nd line of the road of the Bupyeong-gu Incheon Bupyeong-gu funeral, Incheon, with the side side of the opening elementary school from the modern roptel gate, conflict with the front part of the H bus, the left side of which was directly in front of the right side of the instant vehicle, due to the negligence going through by the median of the central line, from the shooting distance at the right side of the road at the right side of the direction.
(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.
At the time of the instant vehicle, I, in addition to Defendant D, boarded, J, K, L, and M was on board the back seat. However, due to the instant accident, I died of the instant vehicle to be a large beer and beer, around 10:40 on the same day.
Plaintiff
A and B are parents of I, Plaintiff C are punished by I, and Defendant E is a person with parental authority of Defendant D, who was the 15 years of age and 8 months of age at the time of the instant accident.
[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1, 2, 5, 6, Eul evidence 1, and the purport of the whole pleadings
2. Occurrence of liability for damages;
A. A person engaged in driving service of Defendant D’s damage liability is obliged to thoroughly drive the vehicle in front and in a safe manner, and to safely drive the vehicle along the center line.
Nevertheless, Defendant D is negligent in the course of business in the course of running the instant vehicle without obtaining a driver’s license, and there is a proximate causal relationship between such negligence and the instant accident.