1. Of the judgment of the court of first instance, KRW 110,235,782 against the Plaintiff regarding the same construction company among the judgment of the court of first instance, and the aforementioned amount, July 2013.

1. Basic facts

A. 1) The Korea National Housing Corporation is a party to the dispute. The Korea National Housing Corporation is a party to the dispute with 14-dong 14-dong apartment complexes of small-type 4,104, small-type 14-dong 14-dong.

A) A newly built executor and sold in lots. On October 1, 2009, the Plaintiff comprehensively succeeded to the property, claims, and other rights and obligations of the Korea National Housing Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff”) pursuant to Article 8(1) of the Addenda to the Korea National Housing Corporation (amended by Act No. 9706, May 22, 2009) as a public corporation established following the merger between the Korea National Housing Corporation and the Korea Land Corporation (hereinafter referred to as “Korea National Housing Corporation”).

2) The Defendant Newdong Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Newdong Construction”), the Defendant Gohap Comprehensive Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Gohap Construction”), and the Co-Defendant Pream Industry Co., Ltd. in the first instance trial (hereinafter “Co-Defendant Pream Industry”) are co-contractors who received a contract for one of the instant apartment construction works (hereinafter “instant construction works”), among the instant apartment construction works (hereinafter “instant construction”).

3) Defendant Same Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant same Construction”)

2) Of the instant construction works, the instant landscaping works (hereinafter “instant landscaping works”) are deemed to be the same.

4) The Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Mutual Aid Association”) guarantees each of the defect repair obligations pertaining to the instant construction works by Defendant Newdong Construction and Defendant same Construction.

B. On July 4, 2003, the Plaintiff entered into each contract. As to the construction work of Defendant Newdong Construction, Defendant Crhos Integrated Construction, Defendant Crhos Co-Defendant Prup Industry, and the instant Section 1, the construction work amount of KRW 27,030,000 is KRW 27,00,000. Co-Defendant Prup Forest Industry in the first instance judgment is awarded a contract by the method of performing the sewage treatment facilities construction work among the construction work of one section, and Defendant Newdong Construction, and Defendant Crhos Integrated Construction among the construction work of one section.