1. The judgment of the first instance court, including the Plaintiff’s claim extended at the trial room, shall be modified as follows:

The defendant.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Defendant was entrusted by the Plaintiff with the transportation of Canadian Cylebox 182,00 km (hereinafter “instant cargo”).

B. On February 23, 2014, the Defendant: (a) loaded the instant cargo loaded with 7 containers (40 feet) from Canadian Bandcos (40 feet) and 010W; and (b) issued a bill of lading indicating the shipper’s magnetic director, consignee, Plaintiff, Canadian Bandcos, and the influor of the Republic of Korea’s mineral form.

B. In the above bill of lading, the so-called “the consignee entered and stored in bulk,” and the so-called “Canadian mountain sain canadian scams” were written.

C. The instant cargo arrived at the luminous port on March 12, 2014 and was unloaded to the luminous port container terminal.

After receiving the instant cargo on March 26, 2014, the Plaintiff discovered that: (a) the lower end of one of the seven containers in which the instant cargo was stored (number HJU136590, hereinafter “the instant container”); (b) the arbitra of the lower end of one of the seven containers in which the instant cargo was stored (hereinafter “instant container”); (c) the Plaintiff temporarily sealed the instant container using Aluminum tape; and (d) the Plaintiff discovered that the arrae was damaged 26 tons of sugar fluorbing, loaded in the instant container.

(hereinafter referred to as the “instant cargo” was loaded into the instant container, and the damaged 26 tons of sugar spambling is e.g.

On March 27, 2014, the Plaintiff sent a document to the Defendant stating that the part of the instant cargo was damaged by facsimile. On the same day, the Plaintiff sent the same document to the Korea Commercial Damage Insurance Co., Ltd., which was an insurance company that entered into a non-life insurance contract for the instant cargo, by facsimile.

F. At that time, the Korea Marine Fire Compensation Insurance Co., Ltd. requested for the verification of damages to Peong Marine Fire Compensation Co., Ltd., and the inspector affiliated with Peong Marine Fire Compensation Co., Ltd. visited the Plaintiff’s factory where the instant cargo was kept on April 7, 2014.