The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the court below's imprisonment (ten months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable;

2. The judgment is a favorable condition to the defendant that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and reflects the fact that the defendant does not have the same criminal records.

On the other hand, even though the amount of embezzlement is not so much, the defendant did not agree with the victim or recover the victims from the damage until the trial, and the defendant committed the crime of this case during the period of repeated crime.

In addition, considering the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, the conditions of sentencing specified in the argument of this case, such as the circumstances after the crime, it is not recognized that the sentence of the court below is too unreasonable. Thus, the above argument of the defendant is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.