The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The summary of the grounds for appeal is too unreasonable that the lower court’s imprisonment (six months of imprisonment and one year of suspended execution) is too unreasonable;

2. The circumstances are favorable to the Defendant that recognized the instant crime and reflects the fact that the Defendant restored the leased mountainous district, and that the Defendant does not have the same criminal power.

On the other hand, it is difficult to see that the nature of the crime of this case is good, and the area of the mountainous district used without permission is not small.

In addition, considering the sentencing balance with the same kind of crime, the defendant's age, character, conduct and environment, motive, means and consequence of the crime, etc., the sentence of the court below is not deemed to be too unreasonable, since the defendant's above assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act since it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.