logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 천안지원 2019.07.12 2019고단901
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment for one year, and Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won, respectively.

Defendant

B does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From the end of April 2018 to February 20:30, 2019, Defendant A operated D marina business in the 2nd floor of the Seo-gu Seoul building in Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seo-gu, Seocheon-gu. Defendant A engaged in the act of arranging sexual traffic, such as arranging sexual traffic, by inducing male customers to face and engage in sexual traffic using the mixed sea, on the condition that sexual traffic would give 50,000 won and 70,000 won to female employees.

2. Defendant B, from January 15, 2019 to February 20:30, 2019, while working as female employees at the business establishments listed in paragraph (1) from January 15, 2019 to February 14, 2019, the Defendant promised to receive the same price as that specified in paragraph (1) from the business owner A, thereby leading to his/her hand and her injury to an unspecified number of male customers, and engaged in sexual traffic using the b

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendants’ respective legal statements

1. A protocol concerning the interrogation of suspects of E;

1. Police seizure records;

1. Report on the results of analysis of digital evidence on the businessphones;

1. Photographs of the control site and details of account transactions;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to investigative reports;

1. Article relevant to the facts constituting an offense and the selection of punishment;

A. Defendant A: Article 19(2)1 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic, Etc. and choice of imprisonment

B. Defendant B: Article 21(1) of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic; Selection of a fine

1. Article 70 (1) and Article 69 (2) of the Criminal Act in the custody of a workhouse (Defendant B);

1. Article 62 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. Article 48 (1) of the Criminal Act (Defendant A);

1. The surcharge (the defendant A) Article 25 of the Act on the Punishment of Acts of Arranging Sexual Traffic (the surcharge shall be determined as shown in the text according to the calculation details of investigation report (the investigation record No. 10 pages));

1. The grounds for sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (Defendant B) and the act of arranging sexual traffic shall be commercialized.

arrow