The defendant shall be innocent.

1. On September 9, 2015, the Defendant committed an indecent act by taking advantage of the congested gap within the subway 9 lines of subway line D, subway 9, the Defendant committed the Defendant’s front body and body closely with the Defendant’s front body and body.

2. In light of the following circumstances, the Defendant had the intent to commit an indecent act at the time on the part of the police of the victim and the statements in the court alone.

It is insufficient to conclude that it is, and there is no other evidence to acknowledge it.

The Defendant, who was on board the 9th line rapid train in D basin, seeed the back side of the victim, etc., and seeed the cell phone image with the left hand and seeed the left hand of the cell phone with a cellphone.

At the time, subway was very complicated with people to move their jobs to the extent that they are capable of moving their jobs (the defendant had time space to move his jobs).

There is no material to see). Therefore, due to the above defendant's attitude, the victim got fast to one another to the extent that it is difficult for the victim to see (the victim saw a mobile phone after a man gets off from the D Station, etc., and sees a mobile phone, and made a contact with the left part of the left part of the right shoulder, as the victim gets on the left part of the left part, and sees the upper part and the tample part.

With the left side, the person's chest was completely contacted, the left part of the cell phone was cut off on the left side of the face, and the person's cell phone was cut off to the front of the face, and the person's body was contacted even on the left side, and the person's body was thought to have been cut off at the left side, and the victim and the person next to the victim are defendants several times.