logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 2018.12.05 2017가단515974
건물명도(인도)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. Defendant C, among the real estate listed in the attached Form 1, issues indicated in the attached Form 4, 5, 6, 7, and 4, respectively.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. Defendant B is the Plaintiff’s South Eastdongs, and Defendant C’s children.

B. On August 2, 2012, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant building (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”) on the ground (hereinafter referred to as “instant building”) in Sungsung-si, J 1,470 square meters (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”). When referring to the entire land and the instant building, the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant real estate (hereinafter referred to as “instant real estate”).

C. The instant building, which is an independent 2 bonds, was organized into a single registry.

In the title section of the registry, the Kdong building among the instant buildings was indicated as “247.2 square meters in general steel structure and other secondary neighborhood living facilities of the 2nd roof,” and the Ldong building as “309.6 square meters in general steel structure and other secondary neighborhood living facilities of the 2nd roof.”

The Extension Corporation on the instant building made up of May 28, 2013, and the said Kdong building was extended to two different floors, such as the real estate listed in the attached Table 1 (hereinafter “instant Kdong building”). The said Ldong building was extended to two different floors as shown in the attached Table 2 (hereinafter “instant Ldong building”).

However, since the contents of extension in the register are not reflected in the register, the entry in the register and the actual status were different.

E. After the Plaintiff acquired the ownership of the instant real estate, Defendant B mainly managed the instant real estate including the conclusion of a lease agreement upon the Plaintiff’s delegation, and the Plaintiff terminated the delegation of the said authority to Defendant B around February 22, 2017.

F. Defendant C connects each point of (D) part of the building of this case, which is 26.525m25m2 in sequence of the annexed drawing No. 4, 5, 6, 7, and 4, among the buildings of this case, and the part (D) of the building of this case, which is 33.2175m2, 14, 15, 16, 17, and 14m2 in sequence, connected each point of (e) part of the building of this case, which is 33.2175m2, 5, 6, 7, and 4m2 of the annexed drawing No. 1, and the part (e) of the building of this case, which is 33.2175m2,175m2, which is 33.2175m2 (hereinafter referred to as “the aforementioned part”) among the building of this case

arrow