The sentence of sentence against the defendant shall be suspended.

Punishment of the crime

around October 2016, the Defendant decided to transfer the studio “D” in Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government to the victim E, and received any balance from the victim on November 16, 2016 and delivered the said studio tele and internal facilities to the victim on the same day.

On November 17, 2016, the Defendant taken off the list of the entrance rooms owned by the victim and the so-called so-called Mask Turkey, etc. using the cresh of the victim's studio management office at around 06:00 on November 17, 2016, by using the cresh of the victim's cresh.

L. A. L. theft was committed.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Each legal statement of witness E and F;

1. E statements;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to monthly contracts, contracts for transfer of rights, and settlement of public imposts;

1. Relevant Article 329 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts, the choice of punishment, and the choice of fines;

1. A fine not exceeding 500,000 won to be suspended;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act (100,000 won per day) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 59 (1) of the Criminal Act (see, e.g., Article 59 (1) of the Suspension of Sentence (see, e., Supreme Court Decision 2006Da1448, Apr.