logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
Text
Reasons
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 수원지방법원 안양지원 2017.06.12 2017고단697
재물손괴등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. On February 18, 2017, the Defendant damaged the victim’s automatic entrance by taking the automatic entrance door from his body to fall short of the support cost of the automatic entrance, without any justifiable reason, at the front of the clothing store for the operation of the victim C, which is located in Ansan-si B, Mayang-si, Mayang-si, Mayang-si.

2. The Defendant made a public performance, at the same time, at the same place as the above paragraph 1, and at the same time, at the same time and place as mentioned in the above paragraph 1, she had the disturbance avoided into the clothing shop as described in the above paragraph 1, but was prevented to the employees, and she made a public performance by advertising out the employees in the above automatic entrance and outside the above automatic entrance, and making out the sexual organ.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Written statements in C and D;

1. Results of the investigation report (CCTV verification);

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes concerning field photographs and CCTV closure photographs;

1. Relevant Article 366 of the Criminal Act, Article 245 of the Criminal Act (a point of damage to property), and the selection of fines, respectively, for the crime;

1. The former part of Article 37 of the Criminal Act, and Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the same Act, which aggravated concurrent crimes;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 16 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Punishment, etc. of Sexual Crimes Committed to Order;

1. Sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act: The fact that the sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the Provisional Payment Order is due to the poor nature of the crime in light of the background and content of the crime, etc.; the fact that there was a history of having been suspended from indictment for the crime of destroying property in light of the background and content of the crime; the fact that there

arrow