logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2017.12.08 2017고단7322
성매매알선등행위의처벌에관한법률위반(성매매알선등)등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment with prison labor for a year and a fine of ten million won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. No one shall receive money, valuables or other property benefits from many and unspecified persons and arrange sexual traffic, in violation of the Act on the Punishment, etc. of Acts, such as arranging sexual traffic;

Nevertheless, on October 2015, the Defendant, along with C (final conviction on January 25, 2017), placed an advertisement of commercial sex acts ice for a business trip in the name of “E-mail” in D, etc., an Internet advertising site, and decided to conduct commercial sex acts against male customers who reported and contacted the advertisement.

C, on October 23, 2015, after receiving 240,000 won as the price for sexual traffic from a male guest who reported and contacted with the advertisement, received a promise to engage in sexual traffic, and the Defendant informed the Defendant. The Defendant, as a content of the said promise, had the F (one person: G) employed by himself/herself do sexual intercourse with the said guest in Seoul, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, as well as arranging sexual traffic by allowing him/her to engage in sexual intercourse with the said guest in accordance with the said promise, and arranged sexual traffic by the same method from around that time to April 5, 2016.

2. A foreigner who intends to be employed in the Republic of Korea in violation of the Immigration Control Act shall obtain the status of sojourn eligible for employment activities, and no person shall employ any foreigner whose status of sojourn eligible for employment activities is not granted;

Nevertheless, from January 2016 to April 5, 2016, the Defendant prepared an office in Gangnam-gu Seoul J and 202, and entered the Republic of Korea as Seoul J and 202 as a visa exemption (B-1) and could not engage in job-seeking activities in the Republic of Korea, and hired F (one person) in illegal stay, thereby allowing an unspecified number of customers to provide marina services in return for money.

As a result, the defendant employed a foreigner who did not obtain the status of stay that could work.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A protocol concerning the suspect examination of the accused by the prosecution;

1. A copy of the protocol concerning the interrogation of suspect with respect to F;

1. Each police officer against K, L, and C.

arrow