1. All appeals by the Defendants are dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Defendants.

Purport of claim and appeal

1.

Based on the facts, the Plaintiff, a non-life insurance company engaged in automobile insurance business, entered into a comprehensive automobile insurance contract with the insurance period from April 29, 2013 to April 29, 2014 with respect to the Arenzers car Co., Ltd. and C (hereinafter “Plaintiff-Vehicle”).

The Defendants are driving D vehicles (hereinafter referred to as “Defendants”).

On June 22, 2013, around 16:00, the accident occurred between the plaintiff's vehicle and the defendant's vehicle driving by the defendant A on the front of the E apartment at Jeju.

(2) On June 23, 2013, the following day after the accident occurred, Defendant A demanded the hospital treatment to the Plaintiff, and received treatment from June 24, 2013, from the next day, the following day. The Plaintiff’s vehicle was changed from the Defendants’ vehicle to a green signal, but the Plaintiff’s vehicle, which was behind the Plaintiff’s vehicle due to a sudden stop, operated the brac, but was pushed down by the brac, while the brac was pushed down.

Defendant B demanded treatment from the Plaintiff at the time of Defendant A’s commencement of treatment and received such treatment from the Plaintiff.

The medical doctor H provided medical treatment to the Defendants on June 23, 2013. According to the medical record at the time, the Defendant: (a) complained of a so-called so-called so-called so-called “so-called “so-called” and “so-called “so-called” and “so-called “so-called” and “so-called “so-called” and “so-called” and “so-called “so-called” and “so-called “so-called” were

In addition, the defendant A appeared to have more serious symptoms on June 24, 2013, and even from June 25, 2013 to June 30, 2013, the pain was not good.

The defendant A continued symptoms on July 1, 2013, and complained of the frily pain, and the two copies and the right upper sub-chapters were the most inconvenient.

The defendant A according to the opinion of the defendant A prepared by the G Institute of Korean Medical Doctors H on December 4, 2013.