logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 마산지원 2017.06.20 2017고단465
근로기준법위반등
Text

The prosecution of this case is dismissed.

Reasons

1. Summary of the facts charged

A. The Defendant, as the representative of C in Haan-gun, was an employer who operates the steel structure manufacturing business as of November 3, 2016, and was employed on November 18, 2016, and did not pay the total amount of KRW 37,910,000 of the victims’ wages as of November 18, 2016, including KRW 1,100,000, as indicated in the details of personal delayed payment, within 14 days from the date of retirement without any agreement on the extension of the payment period between the parties.

B. The Defendant, as the representative of C in Hanam-gun, was an employer who was engaged in the steel structure manufacturing business as of March 11, 2015, and was employed on his/her retirement pay of KRW 8,358,100 as of January 31, 2017, and did not pay the total of KRW 17,040,767 of the victims’ retirement pay as of January 31, 2017, including KRW 8,358,100 as of January 31, 2017.

2. Each of the facts charged in the instant case is an offense against the victim’s express intent under Article 109(2) of the Labor Standards Act and the proviso of Article 44 of the Act on the Guarantee of Workers’ Retirement Benefits.

After the institution of the instant prosecution, the victims expressed their intention not to be punished against the Defendant to this court on May 31, 2017 and June 8, 2017, respectively.

Therefore, the public prosecution of this case is dismissed in accordance with Article 327 subparagraph 6 of the Criminal Procedure Act.

arrow