Defendant shall be punished by a fine of two million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Punishment of the crime

Around December 10, 2018, the Defendant: (a) received a proposal from an Buddhist person who misrepresented a lending business entity to lend money by using a letter to those who are aware of the lending; (b) granted a temporary loan to the B Bank Company for six months on a temporary basis; and (c) accepted a proposal to the effect that “When sending a check card, electronic computer work will be carried out and loan will be carried out through an entry fee,” and then, (d) sent the check card linked to the account under the name of the Defendant to the D Bank (F) near the D convenience store located in Kimhae-si, Kimhae-si, at around 14:00, on December 11, 2018.

Accordingly, the Defendant promised to receive compensation and lent the means of access.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written evidence and a written statement of the G production;

1. Details of H dialogue;

1. Application of statutes on details of financial transactions;

1. Relevant legal provisions concerning facts constituting an offense, and Articles 49 (4) 2 and 6 (3) 2 of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act concerning the selection of punishment;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The reasons for sentencing under Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act for the order of provisional payment are favorable circumstances, such as the fact that the defendant confessions and reflects the crime, and that the defendant is an initial offender who has no previous criminal record.

However, the act of lending the means of access to electronic financial transactions, such as the instant crime, is in an indivisible relationship with the Bosing crime, and there is a high need for strict sanctions.

In addition, the account of this case was abused for the singishing crime, thereby causing actual damage.

In addition, the defendant's age, career, character and conduct, motive of crime, circumstances after crime, etc. and various circumstances shown in the trial and records shall be determined as ordered.