logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울남부지방법원 2016.05.19 2016고단1043
야간건조물침입절도등
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. From February 21, 2016, around 06:30 on February 21, 2016, the Defendant: (a) took the front and rear number plate of the victim D, which is installed in the container stuffed parking lot in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, by using the stampner.

Accordingly, the defendant stolen the victim's property.

2. At night, the Defendant was an employee from “h” in the operation of the Victim G in Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F.

On February 22, 2016, at around 04:30, the Defendant taken up the key of the “H” container office at the bottom of the container where the key of the said container office was hidden, and intruded into the office by using the key that was in possession, and operated the vehicle with the key of the vehicle located in the parking lot, and operated the vehicle at the level of KRW 68 million at the market price owned by the victim, which was parked in the parking lot.

Accordingly, the defendant invadedd a structure at night and stolen the victim's property.

3. On February 22, 2016, the Defendant illegally used air defense, at around 09:30, attached the E number plate that was stolen, as described in paragraph (1) above, to the vehicle (one ton, sealed height 3) at a public parking lot located in the J of the city of Gyeongnam-si, Changwon-si, as described in paragraph (1) above, as shown in paragraph (2) above.

Accordingly, the defendant used the marks of public offices for the purpose of exercising them.

4. On February 22, 2016, from around March 10, 2016 to around March 10, 2016, the Defendant used the vehicle I (1 ton, sealed, and 3) with the E number plate that stolen, as described in the foregoing paragraph (3), at the Changwon Gyeongwon.

Accordingly, the defendant exercised the marks of public offices that were unlawfully used.

5. Violation of the Road Traffic Act (Non-licenseed Driving) Defendant 1 operated the vehicle as indicated in paragraph 3 (1 ton, 3) without obtaining a driver’s license at the same location as indicated in paragraph 4 above.

Summary of Evidence

1. The defendant's statement in court;

arrow