logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 창원지방법원 진주지원 2015.06.16 2015고단186
산업안전보건법위반등
Text

Defendant

A Imprisonment of eight months, Defendant B shall be punished by a fine of seven thousand won,00,000 won.

However, the defendant A.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

Defendant

B A Co., Ltd. is a business owner performing the construction of a C factory in Yong-si after being awarded a contract from C to five full-time workers, from April 10, 2014 to December 30, 2014. Defendant A is an employer who acts for the business owner as a site manager in charge of overall management of matters concerning safety and health of workers belonging to the said construction site.

1. Defendant A

A. On July 25, 2014, around 10:26, around 2014, the Defendant instructed four persons, including victims E (the age of 38), etc., to engage in steel structure (the age of 38) operations on the roof of the factory building.

The above workplace was at a height of about 10 meters above ground, and there was no space other than the steel structure installed in the existing structure, and there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance due to fall, etc., inasmuch as the floor is cut off due to the characteristics of the steel structure, and the risk of safety accidents, such as fall, etc., of workers due to the collapse, etc., such as installing a work plate or a safety watch or wearing a safety belt.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected to take care of four working persons, including victims E, etc., and ordered work without taking any safety measures, and led to the death of the victim E, who had been engaged in connecting the steel structure above the steel structure above the steel structure, falling on the ground and falling on July 31, 2014 at around 03:19.

B. Around August 8, 2014, the Defendant violated the Occupational Safety and Health Act, even though he/she had to take necessary measures to prevent risks caused by electricity, heat, and other energy when operating a business at the said workplace, he/she did not install a arbitr on the temporary charging unit of a newly-built factory and did not contact with the temporary charging unit of a newly-built factory.

2. Defendant B.

arrow