logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 부산지방법원 2013.11.28 2013가합40004
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The plaintiff (Counterclaim defendant)'s main claim and the defendant (Counterclaim plaintiff, designated party)'s counterclaim are all dismissed.

2...

Reasons

1. Determination on the main claim

A. Facts of recognition 1) Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant; hereinafter “Plaintiff”) is limited to Plaintiff (Counterclaim Defendant);

) The E Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “E Co., Ltd.”) in which the same person D is the representative director.

(1) as the founder of the company, the chairman of the company, who operates the company, is the Defendant (Counterclaim Plaintiff, Counterclaim Party, hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant”).

(B) The non-party company from December 1, 2001 to June 2006 is a person who served as an executive director (unregistered director) in the non-party company, and the Selection C is the defendant's wife. The non-party company is an alternative sub-party to the company (hereinafter referred to as "sub-party sub-committee") upon the introduction of the defendant on November 16, 2004.

(C) On May 2005, the non-party company borrowed KRW 650 million as a condition of 4 months of borrowing and 2.5 million per month of interest rate, but was unable to fully repay it after the due date due to the financial shortage. (c) On May 20, 2005, the non-party company was unable to pay the amount of KRW 100 million as an alternative for the company to pay the said company's KRW 100 million by June 23, 2005, and the plaintiff was to pay the amount of KRW 100 million as an alternative for the above Paragraph (b).

2) As to the “sales contract” (hereinafter “sales contract of this case”)

The non-party company is provided with each other, and the non-party company is the Busan Metropolitan City, the payee corporation, and the flag transfer theory of the payee corporation (hereinafter referred to as "predinant theory") on July 22, 2005, the date of the payment, July 22, 2005, respectively.

ii)the Promissory Notes (hereinafter referred to as “instant Promissory Notes”)

The defendant issued a Chapter 1 and delivered it to the defendant to use foreign currency loans for the non-party company.

A seller: A seller: A guarantor of the purchase price for the plaintiff: 350 million won: 110 million won/the remainder: the remainder payment of 240 million won and the date of payment of real estate name: A seller who has not entered into this contract shall have the status of this contract.

arrow