logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.05.14 2014가합2743
회원자격확인
Text

1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Reasons

1. The plaintiff alleged that he was entitled to purchase membership of the defendant company from the non-party D, who was the head of the headquarters of the defendant company B (hereinafter "the defendant company"), on April 5, 2009, and paid KRW 1.60 million to D, and exercised all rights after attending the establishment of the defendant company. The defendant company notified the plaintiff of the suspension of membership on the ground that the plaintiff did not pay any balance. The plaintiff sought confirmation of the status of membership against the defendant.

2. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of evidence Nos. 1, 2, and 3 as well as the argument, the Plaintiff paid KRW 160,000 to D, who was the head of the Defendant Company, around April 5, 2009. Meanwhile, in full view of the respective statements and arguments Nos. 1 through 4, 6, 7, 8, 10, 11, and 12 of the Defendant Company’s security deposit, the Plaintiff succeeds to the initial right to sell 1,60,000 won out of 1,000 won of the Defendant Company’s security deposit, and deposited 10,000 won out of May 4, 2010 with the Defendant Company’s account No. 1050,000 won to the Defendant Company, and the Plaintiff did not request the Plaintiff to suspend the Plaintiff’s rehabilitation deposit from around 20, 2012 to around 10, 2012.

arrow