logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 울산지방법원 2015.10.12 2015고정1330
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of three million won.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, KRW 100,000.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

[2015 High Court 130]

1. At around 13:10 on June 5, 2015, the Defendant driven Caltoba while under the influence of alcohol content of about 0.117% without a motorcycle driver’s license on a section 7 km from the front road of Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Ulsan-gun, Glsan-gun, Glsan-gun, Gluri-gun, Gluri-do.

[2015 High Court Decision 1332]

2. On June 5, 2015, at around 13:55, the Defendant driven Calba in a state of under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.070% from the side side of the road adjoining to the same road from around 3 meters to the same road.

Summary of Evidence

[2015 High Court 130]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses;

1. A report on the statement of the status of a driver of the driving school (2015, 1332);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. The ledger of driver's licenses;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to reports on the statement of the situation of a driver;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 148-2 (2) 2, Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving under the influence of alcohol on the market), Article 148-2 (2) 3, and Article 44 (1) of the Road Traffic Act (the point of driving under the influence of alcohol on the market), subparagraph 2 of Article 154 and Article 43 of the Road Traffic Act concerning criminal facts, respectively;

1. Articles 40 and 50 (Mutual between the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act of Article 1 at the time of the marketing and the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act of Article 2 at the time of the holding, the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act of Article 2 at the time of the holding, and the crimes of violation of the Road Traffic Act of the Road Traffic Act of the said

1. Selection of each alternative fine for punishment;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 (1) and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. The fine shall be reduced as ordered by the order, taking into account the crimes No. 1 of the Criminal Procedure Act and the background leading up to the occurrence of the crimes No. 2 of the judgment, age, circumstances, etc. of the defendant, as indicated in the sentencing reason under Article

arrow