Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 1.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Punishment of the crime

[Attachment 2013]

1. Around 22:00 on December 2, 2012, the Defendant obstructed the victim’s restaurant business operated by the victim D in Gangnam-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, “E restaurant,” the mother of the victim and the victim, is running the restaurant business, and the Defendant interfered with the victim’s restaurant business by force for about 20 minutes, with the desire to “if he or she was unable to run the restaurant business in relation to the kitchen facilities in a public health clinic, he or she would be able to use the kitchen, and why he or she would run the restaurant business.”

2. The defendant, in the date and time, at the place, as described in paragraph (1) and in paragraph (1), has expressed the victim's desire to do so and received a request from the victim for delivery by 20 times due to interference with his/her business, but he/she has not complied therewith and has left the above restaurant on the same day until the police officer dispatched by the victim's report at around 22:40 of the same day arrives, and without justifiable grounds, has taken place.

The Gu refused to comply with the Gu.

[2013 high-level 393] On November 13, 2012, the Defendant: (a) was under the influence of alcohol and the owner of the above restaurant, and found that the victim G (n, 69 years of age) was under the influence of alcohol, the Defendant was able to take the victim’s hand without any reason; (b) was able to carry the victim’s right hand hand hand hand hand hand hand, with the victim’s right hand hand hand hand hand, who was the victim’s right right hand hand hand hand hand hand, and was the victim’s right hand part of the floor of the treatment days.

Summary of Evidence

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Each police officer's statement about D and G;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs of injuries;

1. Article 314 (1), Article 319 (2) and (1) and Article 257 (1) of the Criminal Act of the relevant Act concerning the facts constituting an offense;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act of the provisional payment order;